by Dr Sharif A. Azim
Finally, let us shed some light on what is considered in the
West as the greatest symbol of women's oppression and servitude,
the veil or the head cover.
Is it true that there is no such thing as
the veil in the Judea-Christian tradition? Let us set the
record straight. According to Dr Menachem M. Bayer (Profess.
Of Biblical Literature at yeshiva University. The Jewish woman
in Rabbinic literature, it was the custom of Jewish women
to go out in public with a head covering, which sometimes,
even covered the whole face leaving one eye free.76 he quotes
some famous ancient Rabbis saying," It is not like the
daughter of Israel to walk out with heads uncovered"
and "Cursed be the man who lets the hair of his wife
be seen...a woman who exposes her hair for self-adornment
brings poverty ". Rabbinic law forbids the recitation
of blessing or prayers in the presence of a bareheaded married
woman since uncovering the woman's hair is considered "nudity".77
Dr Brayer also mentions that "During the Tannaitic period
the Jewish woman's failure to cover her head was considered
an affront to her modesty> When her head was uncovered
she might be fined four hundred zuzim for this offense."
DR Brayer also explains that veil of the Jewish woman was
not always considered a sign of modesty. Sometimes, the veil
symbolized a state of distinction and luxury rather than modesty.
The Veil personified the dignity and superiority of noble
women. It also represented a woman's inaccessibility as a
sanctified possession of her husband.
What about the Christian tradition? It is
well known that Catholic Nuns have been covering their heads
for hundreds of years, but that is not all. ST. Paul in the
New Testaments made some very interesting statements about
the veils:" Now I want you to realize that the head of
everyman is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and
the head of Christ is God. Every man who prays or prophesies
with his head covered dishonors his head. And every woman
who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors
her head-it is just as though her head were shaved. If a woman
does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off;
and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off
or shaved off, she should cover head........Among the Canon
laws of the Catholic church today, there is a law that requires
women to cover their heads in church.82 Some Christian denominations,
such as the Amish and the Mennonites for example, keep their
women veiled to the present day. The reason for the veil,
as offered by the Church leaders, is that "The head covering
is a symbol of woman's subjugation to the man and to God",
which is the same logic introduced by St.Paul in the New Testament.
From all the above evidence, it is obvious
that Islam did not invent the head cover. However, Islam did
endorse it. The Quran urges believing men and women to lower
their gaze and guard their modesty and then urges the believing
women to extend their head covers to cover the neck and the
bosom:" Say to the believing men that they should lower
their gaze and guard their modesty....And say to the believing
women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty;
that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except
what ordinarily appear thereof; that they should draw their
veils over their bosoms..."24:30,31). The Quran is still
clear: "O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and
the believing women that they should cast their outer garments
over their bodies (when abroad) so that they should be known
and not molested"(33:59)
This is the whole point, modesty is prescribed
to protect women from molestation or simply, modesty is protection.
Thus, the only purpose of the veil in Islam is protection.
The Islamic veil, unlike the veil of the Christian tradition,
is not a sign of man's authority over woman nor is it a sign
of woman's subjection to man. The Islamic veil, unlike the
veil in Jewish tradition, is not a sign of luxury and distinction
of some noble married women. The Islamic veil is only a sign
of modesty with the purpose of protecting women, all women.
The Islamic philosophy is that it is always better to be safe
than sorry. In fact, the Quran is so concerned with protecting
women's bodies and women's reputation that a man who dares
to falsely accuse a woman of unchastity will be severely punished:"
And those who launch a charge against chaste women , and will
produce not four witnesses(to support their allegations)-Flog
them with eighty stripes; and reject their evidence ever after:
for such men are wicked transgressors"(24:4)
Compare this strict Quranic attitude with
the extremely lax punishment for rape in the Bible:"
if a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be
married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay
the girl's father fifty skeles of silver. He must marry the
girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as
long as he lives"(Deut.22:28-30).One must ask a simple
question here, who is really punished? The man who only paid
a fine for rape, or the girl who is forced to marry the man
who raped her and live with him until he dies? Another question
that also should be asked is this: which is more protective
of women, the Quranic strict attitude or the Biblical lax
attitude? Some people especially in the west, would tend to
ridicule the whole argument of modesty for protection. Their
argument is that the best protection is the spread of education,
civilized behavior, and self restraint. We would say; fine
but not enough. If "civilization" is enough protection,
then why is it that women in North America dare not walk alone
in a dark street-or even cross an empty parking lot? If Education
is the solution, then why is it that a respected university
likes Queen's is has a "walk home service" mainly
for female students on campus? If self restraint is the answer,
then why are the cases of sexual harassment in the workplace
reported on the news media every day? A sample of those accused
of sexual harassment, the last few years, includes: navy officers,
Managers, University professors, senators and the President
of the United States! It is one of the great ironies of the
World today that the very same headscarf revered as a sign
of "Holiness" when worn for the purpose of showing
the authority of man by Catholic Nuns, is reviled as a sign
of "oppression" when worn for the purpose of protection
by Muslim women.
www.the-islam-way.com
About the Author
Dr Sharif Has a PHD in Engineering from Canada University
. He has a larae charity organization. He has writen several
books on Islam
|